|Name||Roxwell Church of England Primary School|
|Ofsted Inspection Rating||Inadequate
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school, converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
|Inspection Date||13 February 2019|
|Address||The Street, Roxwell, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 4PE|
|Religious Character||Church of England|
|Number of Pupils||Unknown|
|Number of Pupils per Teacher||19.1|
|Academy Sponsor||Life Education Trust|
|Percentage Free School Meals||12.9%|
|Percentage English is Not First Language||3%|
|Catchment Area Information Available||Yes, our catchment area data is FREE|
|Last Distance Offered Information Available||No|
Information about this school
Roxwell is a small school with a class for early years children and three other, mixed-aged, classes. The headteacher joined the school in January 2015, at the beginning of the term following the previous inspection. The local authority issued a warning notice to the school in November 2016. This was in response to concerns about progress and attainment in both key stage 1 and key stage 2. A school improvement board was responsible for governance between January 2016 and November 2018.
Summary of key findings for parents and pupils
This is an inadequate school Child protection arrangements are weak. Leaders do not always take appropriate, timely action to protect pupils in response to concerns raised by staff. This puts pupils at risk. Leaders and governors have not ensured that all safeguarding arrangements are fit for purpose. The school’s self-evaluation is too generous. Leaders have not identified the most important areas for improvement. Leadership systems are under-developed. As a result, leadership is weak in areas such as safeguarding, behaviour and attendance. Leaders and governors have not ensured that the pupil premium grant is having the impact that it should. Some disadvantaged pupils do not make strong enough progress to catch up. Fixed-period exclusions are used too readily. The challenging behaviour of a very small number of pupils is not dealt with well enough. There is evidence of unlawful exclusion. The overall rate of attendance is below the national average. The attendance of disadvantaged pupils is well below average. Pupils’ knowledge and use of vocabulary and punctuation are less well developed than other areas of the curriculum. The school has the following strengths The school improvement board has been successful in raising the quality of teaching and pupils’ outcomes. These elements of the school are now good. Pupils behave very well in their classrooms and around the school. They are polite, friendly and well mannered. Staff are vigilant. They notice possible signs of abuse and neglect and report their concerns quickly and appropriately to the designated safeguarding lead. Pupils show good attitudes to learning. They enjoy their work and do their best.