Warren School

What is this page?

We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of Warren School.

What is Locrating?

Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews, neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding Warren School.

To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view Warren School on our interactive map.

About Warren School


Name Warren School
Inspections
Ofsted Inspections
Mrs Kelly Bland
Address Clarkes Lane, Oulton Broad, Lowestoft, NR33 8HT
Phone Number 01502561893
Phase Academy (special)
Type Academy special sponsor led
Age Range 3-19
Religious Character Does not apply
Gender Mixed
Number of Pupils 123
Local Authority Suffolk
Highlights from Latest Inspection

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are keen to be kind and caring.

Often, they do not get the right support at the right time. When this happens, pupils become bored, anxious, distressed or frustrated. This results in some pupils exhibiting aggressive or violent behaviours towards themselves, other pupils, or, more often than not, the staff.

Too many pupils access poor-quality learning opportunities, both in lessons and during social times. These pupils do not receive provision that considers all of their needs, abilities and interests in a coherent way. They do not develop early communication and reading skills.

They are not well prepared for adulthood when they leave the school.
<...br/>Older pupils say that they used to enjoy responsibilities, such as being on the school council, but have not had these opportunities for some time. They say that the school needs more money to improve their facilities, such as the playing areas and the swimming pool.

They say that they really value and have good relationships with the staff. They feel that staff try their very best. However, they also say that there is a lot of staffing change.

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Trustees, governors and leaders have been too slow to take action. New trust leaders have identified that the checks they made before they took charge of the school failed to identify the range of longstanding issues and failings. They have not acted quickly enough to address these issues.

Chronic staffing turbulence and absence persist. When staffing falls too low, leaders send pupils home. This means that pupils do not access the education and care to which they are entitled.

Some pupils, especially when they have already arrived or are on their way to school, become very distressed by these sudden changes in their day. This causes angst to staff, pupils and parents and carers alike.

Leaders have established a broad outline for the curriculum, setting out what they want pupils to achieve.

However, the precise plans about what pupils learn and when they will learn it are highly inconsistent and often of poor quality. Many pupils receive a disjointed set of activities that do not help them develop or learn effectively over time. This includes in their early communication and reading skills.

There is a lack of any extra-curricular activities, trips and visits that help to supplement the curriculum currently.

The day-to-day curriculum planning and provision for older pupils are of a better quality. However, pupils do not receive a well-planned wider curriculum that includes the full range of opportunities to help them make informed decisions about their next steps into adulthood.

The quality of the learning environment across the school site is poor. Areas of the school building are out of use because they are unsafe, such as the swimming pool. Most classrooms and outdoor areas, including in early years, are tired and unwelcoming.

There is a lack of appropriate, high-quality resources to support pupils' learning. This includes much-needed equipment for sensory development, outdoor play or pupils' early communication. Where better resources do exist, staff are not routinely well trained or confident in how to use them effectively with pupils.

Too many pupils do not attend well, and the array of leaders since the school opened have not done enough to address this. When pupils do attend, slow starts to the day, off-task behaviour, unfocused activities and weak planning significantly reduce many pupils' learning time.

Leaders and staff do not have accurate and precise information about pupils' needs.

Until recently, there has been a substantial backlog in annual reviews. Behaviour and risk management plans have been of poor quality. New leaders' efforts to produce better quality guidance to staff are lacking essential health and care needs information.

Therefore, new information being provided to staff is still inaccurate.

Many staff feel that they are not adequately trained or supported. They report a high workload and little time or guidance to undertake this work.

Many say that they do not get any breaks during the day. Some say that they do not feel they can report their concerns to leaders. They feel that there is a culture where staff are penalised or rebuked if they do this.

Leaders and governors do not have capacity to undertake their roles effectively. While they have developed an appropriate action plan to address the major weaknesses in the school, they cannot act on it. Leaders and governors are often undertaking day-to-day basic activities on the school site, for example by teaching classes, administering medicine, dealing with urgent issues on site, or, until recently, running the reception offices.

Their actions are fire-fighting day-to-day issues, rather than bringing about sustained improvements.

A high proportion of parents are frustrated and upset at the significant turbulence in provision. Many have lost confidence in the trust's ability to address their concerns and communicate effectively.

Leaders and governors feel that this is despite some of their best efforts to engage with families. Some parents are positive about the work of the new headteacher in recent months.

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

Trustees, governors and leaders do not have sufficient oversight of safeguarding. It is not until the last few months that they have become aware of longstanding, significant issues in a range of areas, including recruitment, referrals to external services and on-site management.

Leaders have acted to address some of these issues, most notably in the recruitment and recording of pre-employment checks.

However, there has been insufficient urgency and rigour to address other aspects of this work.

There has been a very high use of physical restraint for pupils with some of the most complex needs. Risk assessment and behaviour management over time have been of poor quality.

This has not helped to reduce the high use of physical restraint. This does not create a safe and calm learning environment for pupils and staff.

Some staff do not feel that there is sufficient staff training in health, medical and intimate care needs to keep all pupils safe.

Some also report that they have raised numerous concerns about pupils' safety, which have not been addressed.

What does the school need to do to improve?

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

• Trustees have been too slow to act. They have not ensured that day-to-day leadership is sufficient to address deep-seated and wide-ranging issues quickly.

Trustees should ensure that there is sufficient capacity in leadership, governance and staffing to bring about the urgent improvements required in a sustained way. ? There are wide-ranging weaknesses in safeguarding culture, including in recruitment, vigilance, understanding of statutory guidance, referrals to external agencies, site management, review of behaviour information, risk assessment, and training and induction of staff. Trustees, leaders and governors should work with the local authority to address all these areas in a sustained and meaningful way, so that all reasonable actions, in line with statutory guidance, are taken to protect pupils and staff.

• Trustees have failed to ensure that leaders and staff are sufficiently well trained or well informed to be able to support a range of pupils' needs, including their sensory, medical and intimate care, and their health and behavioural needs. Trustees need to ensure that all appropriate information is used to create a well-informed programme of support for pupils, and that staff are well trained to deliver this programme of support. ? Leaders, staff and pupils are working in a very poor-quality learning environment with limited and/or poor-quality resources.

The building and resources are not supporting a high-quality curriculum, and not meeting pupils' needs. This includes all outdoor areas. Staff report that this is made worse by a near-constant changing of classrooms at very short notice.

Trustees need to address these issues as a matter of urgency, so that the learning environment and resources are appropriate for pupils' learning and care needs. Trustees have lost the confidence of many parents and staff. The new headteacher has established some early positive relationships with some parents and staff.

Trustees need to build on this work and to establish clearer systems for staff and parents to give their views and feel that their concerns are being taken seriously and sensitively. They need to work alongside staff and parents to rebuild positive relationships that, ultimately, result in better cohesive provision for pupils. ? Leaders have not ensured that their intention for the curriculum is well planned and delivered.

There is a lack of detailed, specific schemes of work that outline exactly what classes are going to learn and when. This includes the provision for the delivery of the communication and early reading programmes. Leaders need to ensure that staff have sufficient guidance, training and time to deliver this curriculum, and that they are mindful of staff workload in addressing this issue.


  Compare to
nearby schools