Busbridge Infant School

What is this page?

We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of Busbridge Infant School.

What is Locrating?

Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews, neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding Busbridge Infant School.

To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view Busbridge Infant School on our interactive map.

About Busbridge Infant School


Name Busbridge Infant School
Inspections
Ofsted Inspections
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Mr Darren Heatley
Address Hambledon Road, Busbridge, Godalming, GU7 1PJ
Phone Number 01483417898
Phase Academy
Type Academy sponsor led
Age Range 4-7
Religious Character Does not apply
Gender Mixed
Number of Pupils 162
Local Authority Surrey
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils are bright, lively and eager to please. They are enthusiastic in lessons and love playing together in the beautiful school grounds and woodland.

Pupils are confident about talking to trusted adults if they are worried. The school helps pupils to be kind and look after each other. Staff help pupils with making and keeping friends.

In this way, worries about bullying are quickly dealt with. However, leaders and staff have not carried out their safeguarding duties effectively. The school's systems for recording and sharing concerns about child protection are weak and potentially put pupils at risk.

For a long time, expectations of what pupils learn have n...ot been high enough. The school has not added enough value to what pupils already know, understand and can do. Because pupils achieve well in mathematics, reading and writing, it has been assumed that they are learning an ambitious curriculum.

They are not. Not enough is new to pupils and topics are not planned well enough in subjects across the curriculum to help pupils to remember important knowledge.

Many parents feel lucky that their children attend a school in such an attractive setting.

However, parents are not aware that the school's quality of education needs to be better.

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

The teaching of reading is inconsistent. Staff do not have enough expertise in how to teach phonics.

Leaders are using three different phonics schemes, which is confusing for adults and pupils. Pupils' reading books do not always help them to practise the sounds they know.

Books chosen for class reading are not inspiring enough.

They do not introduce pupils to a rich and ambitious vocabulary. Sometimes books are selected because they fit in with a topic rather than for their own intrinsic worth as compelling children's literature.

Staff do not think deeply enough about exactly what they want pupils to learn.

Some topics are taught just because 'this is the way it has always been'. Teachers are not always clear about the crucial content that pupils need to learn in the early years, or in science and the foundation subjects in Years 1 and 2. Adults supporting children in the early years do not make the most of their interactions with children to build up their knowledge and skills, especially when children are learning outdoors.

Teachers' planning for mathematics is more ambitious. Pupils respond well to their teachers' higher expectations and remember what they have learned. However, teachers and leaders have not made sure that the mathematical learning in the early years leads on to what they learn in Years 1 and 2.

Nevertheless, pupils definitely have a positive attitude to learning. Even the youngest children try hard with tasks and are proud of showing what they have produced. Pupils' written work is neat and conscientious, notably in their carefully composed sentences and paragraphs.

Sometimes a few pupils become restless, but only when they have had to wait too long to get started on a task. Children in the early years settle in well to the routines of the Reception class. They learn to be responsible and independent as positive preparation for Year 1.

Staff get to know children in the early years quickly. They rapidly identify and respond to pupils' changing needs as they move up through the school. Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities are encouraged to learn all that their peers do, with minimal intervention needed.

When particular support is necessary, effective group or one-to-one guidance is swiftly organised.

School leaders have not planned enough opportunities to promote pupils' personal development. Pupils are able to attend a range of clubs and some trips have been safely organised despite the COVID-19 pandemic.

However, pupils have few opportunities to look beyond the school and learn about lives that are different from their own. The school is proud of its values but not all pupils really understand what they mean. A recently revised personal, social and health education programme is helping to enhance the overall provision for pupils' sense of self, resilience and well-being.

The new headteacher has sensibly strengthened the school's senior leadership team in order to share out the workload and develop the curriculum. Staff are wholly supportive of the headteacher and have bought into his plans to improve the school.

Governors are committed to the school.

They frequently seek the views of parents and are good listeners to staff. They have felt reassured by external reviews of the school's performance and safeguarding arrangements. However, they know that they need to balance the support they give with more challenge, in order to identify weaknesses more incisively.

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.

Leaders have not ensured that staff's safeguarding training is up to date. Staff do not understand the importance of noting and referring on concerns about pupils in their care.

Information about individual pupils' welfare is not always recorded in enough detail. Records about the most vulnerable pupils have not been maintained in good order. Communications with other agencies who protect children do not record clearly what information has been shared, when or with whom.

When it was identified during the inspection that some individual records were incomplete, the headteacher took prompt action to follow up concerns with the appropriate professionals.

What does the school need to do to improve?

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

• The school's procedures for sharing information about safeguarding are not fit for purpose. Information about pupils' welfare and communications with other professionals have not been noted accurately or in enough detail.

The school's child protection files are disorganised and some information is missing. Leaders and governors must urgently review and improve arrangements for noting, reporting, referring, storing and sharing information about pupils' welfare and safety. ? Staff do not all understand their safeguarding duties, including the importance of noting and passing on concerns.

Leaders must ensure that all staff fully understand their statutory responsibilities and that they deepen their understanding of potential risk of harm to pupils. ? Until recently, the teaching of reading has not been the top priority in the school. The use of different phonics programmes leads to inconsistent approaches and staff have not had enough training to teach early reading effectively.

Leaders must ensure that staff are trained in an appropriate phonics programme and that books for pupils' own practice are actually matched to the sounds they are learning. ? Pupils' reading diet in English lessons is constrained by the limitations of the topic-led curriculum. Pupils do not have enough rich experiences of high-quality literature.

Leaders and teachers need to ensure that the overall programme for reading, including in the early years, is determined by more demanding fiction and non-fiction texts. ? The curriculum for science and the foundation subjects is not ambitious and does not include enough subject-specific content. In the early years and key stage 1, topics chosen for pupils to study do not prioritise the knowledge pupils need to progress to the next stage of their education.

Leaders need to make sure that curriculum planning is based on an ambitious selection of specific subject content pupils need to learn. ? Staff and leaders have not done enough to promote pupils' personal development. The school does not place enough emphasis on promoting pupils' understanding of British values and the wider world beyond the school.

Leaders should ensure that pupils understand the school's values and that they have more opportunities to develop spiritually and culturally. ? Governors knew that aspects of the school needed to improve but had not identified the real scale of the weaknesses, including the safeguarding failings. Governors must ensure that they get to know more about the curriculum and the school's safeguarding procedures and that they increase the level of challenge in their questions for senior leaders.


  Compare to
nearby schools