We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of Granville Academy.
What is Locrating?
Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews,
neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding Granville Academy.
To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view Granville Academy
on our interactive map.
Most pupils feel comfortable and safe at school. Staff have high expectations of pupils' behaviour. Most pupils meet these expectations and behave well.
However, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are not always supported to behave consistently well. More-vulnerable pupils, including those with SEND, are more likely to be involved in incidents of poor behaviour than their peers. The atmosphere around the school is positive.
Although bullying does not happen frequently, some pupils worry about this more than others. However, pupils know they have people to go to if they experience problems.
Leaders do not have high enough expectat...ions of pupils' academic achievement.
Some aspects of the curriculum lack challenge. Not enough older pupils study academically challenging subjects. Some pupils find the work they are set too easy and do not feel stretched.
They are not always challenged to reach their potential. Teachers do not always adapt provision to meet the needs of pupils with SEND.
The personal development curriculum helps pupils learn about life in modern Britain and the challenges they may face.
However, pupils do not remember enough of what they have learned about these important topics.
Leaders promote the importance of regular attendance at school, but not all pupils are yet meeting the school's expectations.
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders have not put an ambitious curriculum in place.
This is particularly the case for pupils in Years 10 and 11. Leaders have not encouraged enough pupils to study a range of academic subjects such as geography, history and a modern foreign language.
Plans are in place to teach the necessary content in individual subjects.
Subject leaders have thought carefully about the order in which to teach topics. In mathematics, for example, teachers have reviewed how topics are taught in primary schools to help them to decide what to teach in key stage 3. Despite leaders identifying that pupils' writing stamina needs addressing, the curriculum does not provide pupils with enough opportunities to write at length.
Many pupils told inspectors that they write infrequently in subjects other than English.
Pupils' experiences in lessons vary. Many lessons are taught in mixed-ability groups.
Leaders have sensible reasons for this. However, staff do not consistently ensure all pupils' needs are met in these classes. Some pupils are not sufficiently challenged.
They complete tasks quickly, and opportunities to stretch their learning are limited. Some pupils are not sufficiently well supported. Teachers are beginning to provide for the needs of pupils with SEND more effectively than in the past.
The strategies in place to support pupils with complex needs are usually implemented. However, this is less consistent for pupils with less complex needs. When some pupils with SEND are not well supported, they are removed from lessons because staff do not manage their behaviour well.
Many older pupils recognise the improvements to the culture of behaviour within school. Most pupils behave well. Teachers challenge most instances of poor behaviour effectively.
However, leaders have not ensured that staff provide well enough for pupils with SEND. Staff do not manage these pupils' behaviour well and, too often, pupils are removed from lessons. Some pupils with SEND do not attend regularly enough.
Pupils' personal development is promoted through the school's 'values' curriculum and assemblies. Pupils learn about important topics, such as staying safe, maintaining healthy relationships and understanding the rule of law. However, the extent to which pupils can recall what they have learned varies significantly.
Some pupils told inspectors that not all pupils take these activities seriously enough. Other pupils think more needs to be done to celebrate individuality and equality, feeling that it is not yet possible to genuinely 'be who you are'. The careers programme is not implemented well.
Many Year 11 pupils have not benefited from an individual careers meeting before applying for future courses. The academic intervention sessions offered to Year 11 pupils, and the extra-curricular programme offered more widely, are valued more highly by pupils and parents.
Leaders, supported by the trust, are beginning to bring about the necessary improvements.
For example, the leadership of the provision for pupils with SEND is improving. Safeguarding arrangements have been strengthened. Staff who have been at the school for some time speak highly of the changes.
Newer staff also speak positively about their experiences at the school.
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
Staff receive important safeguarding training regularly.
They are well informed about the signs that suggest pupils may need additional help. They know how to record this information. They are aware of how to report possible concerns about adults.
Leaders make appropriate checks when appointing new staff. Leaders from the trust check that placements for pupils who are educated off site are suitable.
Pupils know the risks they face locally.
They know where they can go to get help.
The school uses software to stop pupils accessing unsuitable material online. However, the systems in place to record the actions taken in response to any concerns that arise lack rigour.
What does the school need to do to improve?
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
• Leaders do not have high enough academic expectations of pupils. The curriculum at key stage 4 does not provide pupils with the opportunity to study a broad range of subjects. The proportion of pupils following the English Baccalaureate suite of subjects is low.
Pupils are not as prepared as they can be for the next stages in their lives. Leaders should ensure that the curriculum offer at key stage 4 is ambitious and supports pupils to achieve highly. ? Teachers do not have high enough expectations of what pupils can do.
Some pupils can do more than is expected of them. For example, opportunities to write at length are limited. Pupils do not achieve as highly as they should.
Leaders should ensure that the curriculum implementation challenges all pupils across all subjects. ? Teachers do not always use identified strategies to support pupils with SEND. These pupils' needs are not consistently met.
Leaders should take steps to improve the consistency of provision for pupils with SEND and ensure that their needs are routinely met. ? Vulnerable pupils, including those identified as disadvantaged and those with SEND, are removed from lessons or excluded due to poor behaviour more frequently than their peers. They also attend less regularly.
This creates additional barriers to these pupils' achievement. Leaders should use the data they hold more rigorously to help ensure the most vulnerable pupils feel fully engaged and valued in life at school, as part of their wider strategy to support these pupils. Leaders should ensure that pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils are supported to attend school and remain in lessons.
• The curriculum in place to help prepare pupils for life in modern Britain is new. Some pupils have gaps in their knowledge and understanding of others, including those of different faiths, beliefs and identities. Other pupils do not benefit from the school's careers support effectively.
Leaders should assess pupils' understanding and experiences in these areas to inform plans for further improvement. ? Systems are in place to restrict pupils' access to inappropriate material on the internet when using school devices. However, the arrangements for recording the actions taken in response to concerns need refinement.
Leaders do not use this information as effectively as they could to help keep pupils safe. Leaders should ensure that there is an effective system for recording the support provided to pupils when concerns arise. They should consider how to use this information to further improve the school's work in keeping pupils safe.