We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of Harris Science Academy East London.
What is Locrating?
Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews,
neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding Harris Science Academy East London.
To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view Harris Science Academy East London
on our interactive map.
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Mr Dan MacPherson
Address
Three Mill Lane, London, E3 3DU
Phone Number
02089812680
Phase
Academy
Type
Free schools
Age Range
11-18
Religious Character
Does not apply
Gender
Mixed
Number of Pupils
448
Local Authority
Newham
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
What is it like to attend this school?
Leaders aim to offer pupils an academic education with a strong focus on the sciences. This is what attracts parents and carers and pupils to this school.
However, leaders do not have sufficiently high aspirations for all pupils. Sometimes, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not receive the support they need to learn well. Leaders have not made sure that all pupils' additional needs are identified and planned for effectively.
Pupils do not currently have lessons in religious education (RE). The programme for pupils' personal, social, health and economic (PSHE) education is poorly planned and taught. Consequently, pupils do not build up... their knowledge and understanding effectively in these subjects.
Some pupils told inspectors that they enjoy school and feel safe. However, a number of pupils do not share this view. Many have concerns about staff absence and the number of cover lessons they have.
Some pupils feel unable to talk to staff if they have concerns. Others feel that when they do raise concerns, staff do not listen. Leaders are not doing enough to address these issues.
Leaders and staff do not manage pupils' behaviour consistently or effectively. This includes incidents of bullying. In lessons, pupils do not routinely listen to their teachers.
Staff do not deal quickly with disruption in classrooms. This distracts pupils and means that they cannot learn what the teacher has planned. Poor behaviour after break and lunch sometimes delays the start of lessons.
A significant number of pupils said that bullying is a problem. They felt that staff were not good at resolving issues.
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders and governors want pupils to experience an academic education.
However, they do not ensure that pupils' personal development is promoted effectively. Leaders have not made sure that pupils are routinely taught RE or have relationships and sex education (RSE). These gaps in the curriculum mean that pupils do not develop the knowledge they need to succeed in modern Britain.
Leaders and governors have failed to identify and address significant weaknesses in the school's work, including in respect of safeguarding. Leaders' capacity to bring about the improvements urgently needed is limited.
The provision for pupils' personal development is weak.
There is no clear curriculum for PSHE education. Pupils do not learn enough about consent, healthy relationships and diversity. They are not receiving the information they need to be prepared for life in modern Britain.
Pupils in Years 10 and 12 have received too little support with careers and their next steps after leaving school. Many pupils are frustrated by this.
In Years 7 to 11, some pupils with SEND are not receiving the support they need to learn successfully.
Staffing issues have led to weak leadership of the provision for these pupils. Leaders have not made sure that all staff have accurate information about the pupils they teach. Sometimes, pupils' needs are not planned for and met sufficiently well.
When staff are fully informed about pupils' barriers to learning, support is better and helps pupils to develop their knowledge. However, this is inconsistent.
In the subjects that are taught, leaders have thought about the knowledge they want pupils to know and remember.
For instance, in English, classics and Latin, subject leaders have planned learning to develop pupils' knowledge over time. However, the curriculum is not implemented well in all subjects, including in the sixth form. Some teaching does not build well on pupils' prior understanding.
This limits pupils' readiness to learn new knowledge and ideas. For example, in science, pupils struggled to understand the concept of 'the limit of proportionality' because they had not learned about proportionality before.
From the start of Year 7, pupils are placed into classes based on their ability.
Lower-attaining pupils are not routinely supported to remember the knowledge they have learned before. Sometimes, teachers do not fill gaps in pupils' knowledge before moving on to new subject content. Leaders want to promote pupils' reading.
For instance, Year 7 pupils read with their tutors every morning. However, pupils do not arrive on time and this disrupts these sessions.
Leaders want pupils to be successful in the GCSE and A-level examinations they will take in the future.
Teachers test pupils every half term in formal exams. Teachers also plan revision lessons in the week before the exams. This means that pupils spend a lot of time taking and preparing for exams each term, rather than learning subject content.
Leaders intend to change the way they check on pupils' learning. However, leaders' plans are at a very early stage.
In the sixth form, teachers assess students regularly.
However, they do not use assessment information well to identify and address gaps in students' knowledge. This stands in the way of students achieving highly.
In key stages 3 and 4, pupils behave poorly in lessons.
In some classrooms, pupils struggle to remain focused on the work that teachers have set. In others, pupils talk over the teacher or other pupils. Teachers do not manage this effectively.
As a result, low-level disruption escalates and prevents pupils from learning.
Sixth-form students demonstrate more positive attitudes. They typically focus well on their studies and are motivated to learn.
Pupils in Year 11 are currently learning from home and preparing for their sixth-form courses. There is a wide range of extra activities for pupils to take part in, for example, the Duke of Edinburgh's Award scheme. Pupils appreciate the experiences on offer.
Many staff feel that their workload is unmanageable. Teachers find the six rounds of internal examinations burdensome. Leaders have done too little to support teachers to overcome the challenges associated with teaching across three separate school sites.
Early career teachers do not feel supported by leaders, for example with training and managing behaviour. Support for teachers varies too much from department to department.
Leaders' communication with staff and parents is poor.
Both staff and parents commented on this. Parents are particularly disappointed that there have been no parents' evenings since the start of the pandemic.
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are not effective.
Leaders' and governors' work to promote pupils' safety and well-being is weak. Leaders have not made sure that all required pre-employment checks on staff have been made. The checks that have been carried out are not always recorded correctly, and in accordance with the statutory guidance.
Governors have not acted in a timely way when safeguarding concerns have been raised. These failings risk pupils' safety.
The safeguarding policy omits important detail on specific risks to pupils' welfare, such as peer-on-peer abuse.
Safeguarding training for staff is not fit for purpose. Although staff attend annual training, they are not given clear information on the risks that pupils face locally. This means that staff lack the knowledge they need to identify pupils who may be vulnerable to abuse or harm.
The poorly planned PSHE education curriculum means that pupils are not taught enough about how to keep themselves safe. Pupils do not have an age-appropriate understanding of risks to their welfare. They do not learn about what they can do if they feel unsafe or are worried about the safety of their peers.
What does the school need to do to improve?
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
• Leaders and governors have been too slow to spot and rectify weaknesses at the school. This means that pupils are not receiving an acceptable standard of education. Leaders must ensure that they evaluate the school's work accurately and take effective action to address the areas that need to be better.
• The culture of safeguarding is poor. This puts pupils' welfare at risk. As a matter of urgency, leaders should improve their oversight of safeguarding arrangements.
This includes making sure that all the required pre-employment checks are made, including for governors and school leaders. Leaders must ensure that records of these checks are up to date and accurate. They also need to make sure that the safeguarding policy meets statutory requirements and includes information about contextual safeguarding issues.
Staff need training in how to identify and report risks to pupils' safety. Leaders need to plan and put in place a curriculum that teaches pupils how to stay safe. ? The curriculum does not include RE.
As a result, pupils do not develop their understanding of different beliefs and values. Leaders must make sure that the teaching of RE resumes and that they carefully plan what they want pupils to know. ? Leaders have not ensured that the needs of some pupils with SEND are being fully met.
Leaders have not accurately identified some pupils' needs. Information about pupils' barriers to learning is not shared with all staff. This means that some pupils with SEND do not receive the support that they need to learn well.
Leaders must make sure that pupils' additional needs are assessed correctly. They should ensure that all teachers are fully informed about pupils' needs and use this information effectively to adapt the delivery of the curriculum. ? Pupils take internal examinations every half term.
These examinations are preceded by a period of revision. This reduces the time given to teaching the curriculum, which in turn leads to gaps in pupils' knowledge. It also increases teachers' workload unnecessarily.
Leaders should review assessment systems and make sure that whole-school approaches fully support the delivery of the curriculum, including in the sixth form. Leaders should consider teachers' workload when making decisions about how to check on pupils' learning. ? Leaders have not made sure that the curriculum for RSE meets government guidance.
Pupils, including students in the sixth form, do not have access to well-planned, comprehensive PSHE education or careers programmes. These weaknesses mean that pupils' personal development is not adequately catered for. Leaders must plan and implement a curriculum that prepares pupils for life in modern Britain and supports their future plans for education, employment and training.
Leaders must ensure that the RSE curriculum meets statutory requirements. ? Behaviour in key stages 3 and 4 is poor. Pupils do not listen to teachers in some classes and this is not dealt with effectively.
Some staff do not feel supported by leaders with behaviour management. Poor behaviour disrupts pupils' learning. Leaders must support and train staff to implement the school's behaviour policy effectively.
We recommend using Locrating on a computer for the best experience
Locating works best on a computer, as the larger screen area allows for easier viewing of information.
2024 Primary and GCSE results now available.
Full primary (KS2) and provisional GCSE (KS4) results are now available.