Hyde Park Infants’ School

What is this page?

We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of Hyde Park Infants’ School.

What is Locrating?

Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews, neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding Hyde Park Infants’ School.

To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view Hyde Park Infants’ School on our interactive map.

About Hyde Park Infants’ School


Name Hyde Park Infants’ School
Inspections
Ofsted Inspections
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Mrs Yvonne Jones
Address Hyde Park Road, Mutley, Plymouth, PL3 4RS
Phase Academy
Type Academy converter
Age Range 5-7
Religious Character Does not apply
Gender Mixed
Number of Pupils 243
Local Authority Plymouth
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils follow a curriculum that is not well planned and has deep-rooted weaknesses.

The curriculum lacks ambition and does not provide pupils with the essential knowledge they need to be successful.

Many disadvantaged pupils and pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not get an acceptable education. Teaching is not based on appropriate knowledge or expertise to support these pupils to learn.

As a result, these pupils do not achieve well.

Pupils said that they enjoy school and feel safe. They know about the different forms of bullying and said that bullying is rare.

Behaviour around the school and in lessons is mo...stly positive. However, in some lessons, pupils quickly lose focus and opt out of learning.

Leaders have started to reintroduce a range of activities to broaden pupils' experiences.

These include after-school clubs and visits to local heritage sites. Pupils enjoy these activities.

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

Many children leave the early years not ready for key stage 1.

As pupils move through the school, the gaps in pupils' knowledge widen. This is because many subjects are poorly planned, lack ambition and do not meet the needs of pupils. For example, the English curriculum is incomplete.

There is no agreed curriculum in place for the teaching of writing. Furthermore, curriculum plans, including in the early years, do not identify what pupils need to learn and in what order. The curriculum does not give pupils the knowledge they need to be successful.

Children in the early years do not experience a suitable curriculum. Leaders know that children's physical development is not what it should be. Nevertheless, children do not have an appropriate and accessible outdoor area in which to learn.

This is having a negative impact on children's development and learning. Furthermore, adults do not support children well enough to help them to develop their knowledge. Too often, children flit between planned activities.

This all contributes to children not being ready for key stage 1.

Senior leaders' checks on the quality of education have not been as precise as they need to be. Leaders share these checks with subject leaders.

However, some subject leaders do not have the necessary expertise to carry out these checks. Many members of staff have had little or no professional development. In turn, this has contributed to a weak curriculum.

Senior leaders recognise this and have started to put in place appropriate training for staff. Nevertheless, this has led to weaknesses in teaching and curriculum planning. As a result, many pupils, including disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND, are not learning well.

Pupils have not experienced high-quality phonics teaching. This means that in some year groups, pupils do not read as well as they should, in particular disadvantaged pupils and pupils with SEND. The new acting headteacher quickly recognised that the approach to phonics was not effective.

There is now a structured and consistent approach to the teaching of phonics. However, it is too early to see any significant impact following these changes. There is a sense of urgency from leaders to secure further improvements.

In the past, the multi-academy trust has not given enough support and challenge to make the necessary improvements. New trust leaders and the acting headteacher recognise that there is still much to do to tackle the legacy of underachievement. With support from the trust, the acting headteacher is beginning to take appropriate action to improve the standard of education.

Leaders promote modern British values well. However, a large proportion of pupils do not have an age-appropriate understanding of how to lead a healthy lifestyle.

The vast majority of parents are happy with the school.

They are particularly positive about the changes that are being implemented.

Staff said that in the past morale has been low. They said that more recently this has improved.

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

Staff have regular, up-to-date safeguarding training. They know the signs to look out for should a pupil be at risk of harm.

Staff know the procedures for recording any concerns they may have. Leaders take appropriate action to ensure that pupils and their families get the support they need.

Pre-employment checks on staff are robust.

Governors have a strong understanding of their roles in keeping pupils safe. Pupils know where to go if they have a worry. They trust their adults to keep them safe.

Pupils have an age-appropriate understanding of how to stay safe.

What does the school need to do to improve?

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

• Curriculum planning is weak. Plans do not set out the knowledge that pupils need to know and remember.

These plans lack ambition. This leads to pupils not knowing and understanding what they should. In turn, pupils do not achieve as well as they should.

Leaders must urgently improve curriculum plans. They need to ensure that they are well thought out and support pupils to know more and remember more. Many pupils have fallen behind with their reading, including pupils with SEND.

This is because the curriculum for phonics was not well organised. Leaders have implemented a new reading curriculum. The early signs are that it is having a positive impact on pupils' ability to read.

Nevertheless, leaders need to ensure that pupils who are behind catch up quickly. ? Subject leadership is weak. Staff have not had any appropriate professional development.

As a result, subject leaders are unclear about how to sequence learning in order to improve pupils' knowledge. Senior leaders should ensure that curriculum leaders are well trained and understand how to improve learning in their subjects. ? Pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils do not receive the support they need.

Leaders do not make the necessary checks on what pupils with SEND and disadvantaged pupils know and understand. Consequently, these pupils do not learn as well as they could. Leaders must ensure that teachers use what they know about these pupils to develop their knowledge well.

• The curriculum in the early years does not enable children to gain the essential knowledge they need. This is hampered further by a lack of outdoor provision and adults' lack of knowledge of the children. Leaders need to ensure that the early years curriculum is well planned and staff are well trained, and that the environment supports children's learning.

Senior leaders do not have a considered approach to checking on school improvement. This has led to an inaccurate view of the quality of the curriculum. Leaders need to develop a systematic approach to checking on the quality of education and its impact on pupils' achievement.


  Compare to
nearby schools