St Peter’s Church of England Primary School

What is this page?

We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of St Peter’s Church of England Primary School.

What is Locrating?

Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews, neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding St Peter’s Church of England Primary School.

To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view St Peter’s Church of England Primary School on our interactive map.

About St Peter’s Church of England Primary School


Name St Peter’s Church of England Primary School
Inspections
Ofsted Inspections
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Headteacher Mrs Sarah George
Address School Lane, Caverswall, Stoke-on-Trent, ST11 9EN
Phone Number 01782393118
Phase Academy
Type Academy sponsor led
Age Range 4-11
Religious Character Church of England
Gender Mixed
Number of Pupils Unknown
Local Authority Staffordshire
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.

What is it like to attend this school?

Pupils do lots of interesting things at St Peter's Primary School.

Staff work hard to provide clubs, visits and special days. Whether it is Vikings or pirates in school, a visit by a polar explorer or a trip to the theatre, pupils benefit from many varied and worthwhile experiences. These support their learning and broaden their outlook on life.

In addition, the school promotes values that serve pupils well. This is a safe and cheerful place in which to work and learn.

Staff are kind to pupils.

They take an interest in their lives and local matters. Behaviour around the school is calm, orderly and respectful. Bullying is rare, but pupils and staff kn...ow how to stop it should it occur.

Pupils enjoy school and willingly take on jobs that help each day to run smoothly.

The school provides a broad curriculum. Many subjects, including geography, music, computing and art, are well organised, so pupils learn a lot.

The school teaches most pupils to read and be numerate. However, the school is less successful at supporting those who need extra help. Leaders need to do more to strengthen this important part of the school's work.

What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?

This school does many things well. Leaders and staff are caring and kind. They are interested in pupils' lives and achievements and regularly go the extra mile to provide exciting activities.

Community links and pastoral support are both strong. Pupils behave well and usually get on well with one another. All in all, the school is a happy and safe place where pupils know that they are valued.

The curriculum is broad. Curriculum guidance in different subjects sets out what should be taught and when. In geography, computing, music, design and technology, and art, for example, subject leaders do much to make sure that pupils learn the right things.

Teamwork across the school is strong. Staff regularly share practice and assist one another. On top of this, adults run extra activities that support classroom learning, such as in the coding, eco and technology clubs.

Everyone says that they enjoy their work and feel supported.

The school's approach to teaching letters and the sounds they represent in early years is largely successful. However, aspects of the school's later work to teach reading and mathematics do require improvement.

In reading, the school uses a mix of resources, and some books are not ideal. Many pupils cope with this and move up into key stage 2 being able to read well. On the other hand, some do not.

Support to help these pupils keep up or catch up is not as effective as it could be. Currently, staff do not have sufficient resources or expertise to provide the necessary phonics support. This means that some pupils are not learning to read as well as they could.

In mathematics, the school does have a systematic whole-school approach, which is supported by staff training. Nevertheless, as with reading, help for pupils who fall behind could be better. That said, pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities that are identified in their education, health and care plans do receive effective support, with input from specialists when required.

Assemblies help to reinforce the school's values and generate a sense of celebration and togetherness. Staff recognise and applaud pupils' efforts and achievements. They remind everyone about the importance of supporting others and being a good friend.

Pupils sing loudly and joyfully. A music concert that took place during the inspection served to celebrate pupils' talents and highlighted the school's attention to the arts and performance. Indeed, attention to pupils' personal development is a strength.

Governors and senior leaders care deeply about the school. Many have a longstanding commitment to the school and local area. This shows in the way in which they value the school's involvement in community events.

Since the previous inspection, they have strengthened subject leadership. However, they have not attended to some other matters that require improvement with sufficient urgency. While financial constraints and the disruption caused by COVID-19 have delayed some aspects of school improvement, these are not the only factors.

For example, at the time of the inspection, two governors had still not produced the required paperwork. Governors and leaders need to bring a more attentive, evaluative and decisive focus to the things that need to improve.

During the inspection, parents and carers made many positive comments about the school.

They particularly value the approachability of staff and how welcome their children were made to feel when they first started in early years.

Safeguarding

The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.

The school teaches pupils how to stay safe and act responsibly in different situations.

Staff are informed about the risks that pupils might face and know what to look out for. When they have any concerns, they report them quickly and share information with the right people when necessary. The school site is secure.

First-aid and medical arrangements work as they should.

All the correct checks on staff are carried out and recorded. However, the school is slow to carry out all the correct checks on governors.

This does not mean that children are unsafe, but it does mean that governors are not doing what they should.

What does the school need to do to improve?

(Information for the school and appropriate authority)

• The school's approach to teaching early reading draws on a mix of different resources, some of which are not ideal. Many pupils cope with this, but a proportion do not, and they fall behind.

Once pupils move into key stage 2, support relies heavily on extra sessions outside lessons. Often this does not tie in with what happens in class and is not working well enough. Leaders need to implement a more systematic, whole-school approach to teaching reading that carries on into key stage 2 for those pupils who need it.

• Leaders and governors have not attended to certain matters that require improvement with sufficient urgency. This means that some duties and planned changes to early reading have not been completed. Leaders should take a more evidence-based, focused and strategic approach to school improvement planning.


  Compare to
nearby schools