St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy
What is this page?
We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy.
What is Locrating?
Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews,
neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy.
To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy
on our interactive map.
About St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy
Name
St Thomas More Roman Catholic Primary School, a Voluntary Academy
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Headteacher
Mr Daniel Hewitt
Address
Greenway, Berkhamsted, HP4 3LF
Phone Number
01442385060
Phase
Academy
Type
Academy converter
Age Range
3-11
Religious Character
Roman Catholic
Gender
Mixed
Number of Pupils
Unknown
Local Authority
Hertfordshire
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils are happy and well cared for by the school staff. Relationships between pupils and adults are warm and friendly.
Bullying is very rare. Pupils show tolerance and respect for their peers. They are confident that if any unkindness were to happen, teachers would quickly and effectively stop it from occurring again.
Pupils appreciate the religious character of the school. They develop a strong sense of belonging within their community. They are happy to include each other in their activities.
Pupils value the opportunity to pray regularly and to embody the school's values, which include love and faith. Pupils enjoy learning about other religions. They leav...e school as kind and respectful citizens.
From the early years, behaviour is good. Pupils pay attention in lessons. Any off-task behaviour is quickly dealt with by staff and pupils are supported effectively to return to their learning.
Pupils enjoy taking part in sports and drama clubs as well as school trips. This allows them to develop their interests and build confidence.
Pupils, including those in the early years, do not achieve as well as they should because the quality of education is not consistently effective throughout the school.
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
Leaders have adopted or created curriculum plans that set out what pupils learn in all subjects. Where these work better, for example in physical education, teachers understand the sequence of what pupils learn. They then provide appropriate learning activities which help pupils to feel confident and get better over time.
In mathematics and reading, assessment is used effectively to check what pupils know. Teachers then plan suitable activities to support pupils to improve. However, this is not routinely the case.
Teachers do not routinely check what pupils know in all subjects. This means the work they set can be too easy or that they do not help pupils to resolve misunderstandings in a timely way.
The curriculum for early years is ambitious and well planned.
Children are safe and well cared for. However, not all children learn as well as they could. This is because the curriculum is not being taught as leaders planned.
Leaders have not ensured that the learning environment is appropriately designed and used to promote learning. Staff have not developed the expertise they need to fully support children to develop their personal, physical and social skills.
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) are accurately identified.
Leaders work closely with external agencies to ensure these pupils get some of the help they need. However, as with other pupils, teachers do not check well what these pupils have learned. As a result, too often, what they teach does not cater for pupils' individual needs.
Consequently, some pupils do not make good progress from their starting points.
Leaders ensure that pupils learn to read quickly. From the early years, children are taught phonics in a well-planned manner that prepares them effectively for their next stage.
Pupils love reading. They learn to decode effectively, and they read regularly from books that match the sounds that they have learned. Pupils who fall behind are quickly identified and supported to catch up.
Pupils are calm and orderly in most lessons. This allows everyone to listen and focus on their learning. Sometimes, pupils lose focus.
This tends to happen when they find the work too easy or need more guidance from staff. When this happens, staff quickly support pupils to manage their behaviour and return to their learning.
Leaders have ensured that an appropriate personal, social and health education programme is in place.
Pupils are very positive about what they learn. They develop a strong spiritual understanding and a clear sense of right and wrong. Pupils gain lots from the extra-curricular activities and clubs.
They can develop teamwork skills in the football club, or gain the confidence to speak in public as part of the drama club.
Governors are passionate and knowledgeable about the school. They have the appropriate skills to fulfil their statutory duties.
Despite accurately identifying the areas for improvement in the school, governors have not been sufficiently robust in holding leaders to account in improving the quality of education in a timely manner.
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
Leaders have ensured that appropriate systems are in place to identify pupils who may be at risk of harm.
Staff are well trained in recognising signs that pupils may be at risk of harm. They use the school's systems to report any potential concerns. Leaders act on these concerns in a timely manner, including liaising with external agencies where appropriate.
Pupils learn how to stay safe online and offline.
Leaders ensure that all adults are checked for their suitability to work with children.
What does the school need to do to improve?
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
• Some teachers do not use assessment routinely to check pupils' understanding and to plan what pupils, including those with SEND, will learn next.
For some pupils, this hinders them in securing their understanding of the concepts that leaders want them to know. For other pupils, it means they complete activities which are too easy for them. Leaders should support teachers to understand how best to use assessment to make sure work is not too easy or hard for pupils, to check what pupils have learned and to inform how teachers adjust what they teach to ensure pupils learn what leaders intend.
• In the early years, the activities staff arrange and their interactions with children are not tightly focused on children learning the words, ideas and skills they need to know. As a result, children are not as well prepared for Year 1 and beyond as they should be. Leaders need to ensure they and their staff receive the training and support they need to optimise learning for children to best prepare them for the next stage in their education.
• Governors are not all sufficiently robust in holding school leaders to account regarding the quality of education. Despite a good awareness of what needs to get better, improvements are not being implemented in a timely manner. Governors should ensure that they are effective in holding leaders to account for their work.