We are Locrating.com, a schools information website. This page is one of our school directory pages. This is not the website of The Deanery CofE Academy.
What is Locrating?
Locrating is the UK's most popular and trusted school guide; it allows you to view inspection reports, admissions data, exam results, catchment areas, league tables, school reviews,
neighbourhood information, carry out school comparisons and much more. Below is some useful summary information regarding The Deanery CofE Academy.
To see all our data you need to click the blue button at the bottom of this page to view The Deanery CofE Academy
on our interactive map.
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
Mr Jon Young
Address
Peglars Way, Wichelstowe, Swindon, SN1 7DA
Phase
Academy
Type
Free schools
Age Range
11-18
Religious Character
Anglican/Church of England
Gender
Mixed
Number of Pupils
Unknown
Local Authority
Swindon
Highlights from Latest Inspection
This inspection rating relates to a predecessor school. When a school converts to an academy, is taken over or closes and reopens as a new school a formal link is created between the new school and the old school, by the Department for Education. Where the new school has not yet been inspected, we show the inspection history of the predecessor school, as we believe it still has significance.
What is it like to attend this school?
Pupils at this school do not receive an acceptable standard of education. Gaps in the curriculum and frequent staff changes mean that pupils do not learn well enough over time.
Pupils with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND) do not have their needs understood and met.
Pupils are keen to do well. They value the extra-curricular opportunities that are on offer, but they hope to be given more choice of clubs and visits in the future.
Classrooms are calm places to learn, and pupils move around the school safely. Bullying does occur at this school, but it is not widespread, and pupils will report it to adults, who deal with it quickly. The school ...recognises that there is more to be done to reduce incidents of poor behaviour further.
Pupils feel safe in school. However, pupils do not attend school regularly enough.
Parents and carers do not feel listened to and communicated with.
This has led to a feeling of mistrust and being 'let down' by the school. The trust has an over-generous view of the school's strengths and weaknesses. This means that not enough has been done quickly enough for the school to improve.
What does the school do well and what does it need to do better?
The curriculum is not ambitious for pupils. The school curriculum follows the national curriculum. However, it does not set out precisely what pupils will learn and when in each subject.
This means that pupils learn disjointed topics that do not build on what they already know. Cover staff and non-specialists teach a high proportion of the lessons in this school. When pupils are not taught by the same person over a series of lessons, content is sometimes repeated or missed.
This means that pupils studying the same subject but in different classes will learn different things. Pupils have gaps in what they know and can do.
The school does not accurately understand the needs of pupils with SEND.
This means that teachers cannot provide the adaptations that pupils need order to learn. Pupils who do not read as well as their peers are not supported to catch up. Even so, pupils with an education, health and care plan do have their basic requirements met.
School attendance is improving. The school is beginning to understand the barriers that pupils face. However, too many pupils do not attend the school regularly.
Even though the school has made improvements, expectations for attendance and punctuality are still not high enough.
The new 'Values in Practice' curriculum sets out how the school will support pupils' personal development. Most pupils have not experienced this curriculum yet.
Pupils have not had opportunities to learn about and discuss discrimination and fundamental British values. Without this experience, pupils do not always understand that homophobic or racist comments are unacceptable. Not all pupils receive age-appropriate relationships and sex education.
This means that pupils are not well prepared for life in modern Britain.
Pupils have not had opportunities to learn about careers or to experience the world of work. Pupils do not receive impartial advice about further education or apprenticeships.
This means that pupils cannot make informed decisions about their future.
There have been frequent changes in leadership since the school opened in 2019. The current school leadership structure is new and interim.
Vacancies for teachers are often filled with temporary staff on a long-term basis. The trust understands that improvements are needed. However, it does not appreciate the scale of change needed to secure an acceptable quality of education for pupils.
Improvement planning does not identify clear actions to take and by when.
The school and the trust do not communicate well with parents. This has led to a sense of disappointment and mistrust.
Staff want the school to be successful, but they do not always feel listened to by leaders. Repeated changes in systems and procedures, as well as staff vacancies, increase workload.
The trust understands its statutory responsibilities, such as for safeguarding and finance.
However, systems are not in place to accurately monitor and improve the quality of education. For example, pupil premium funding is not overseen closely and so is not used to support disadvantaged pupils effectively. The trust is committed to improving pupils' experiences.
Even so, changes are being made too slowly.
Safeguarding
The arrangements for safeguarding are effective.
What does the school need to do to improve?
(Information for the school and appropriate authority)
• The curriculum is not ambitious enough for pupils.
Component knowledge has not been clearly identified and sequenced. This means that pupils' experience of the curriculum is disjointed. The school and the trust must ensure that the curriculum sets out in each subject exactly what pupils will learn and when, so that pupils build knowledge and skills over time.
• The school does not accurately identify the needs of pupils with SEND. This means that adults cannot provide the adaptations that these pupils need. The school and the trust must provide systems for accurately identifying and communicating pupils' needs, so that all staff can support pupils to know, remember and do more over time.
Pupils do not attend school regularly. This means that many pupils miss out on educational experiences. The school and the trust must raise expectations of school attendance and ensure that rapid support is provided for those pupils with low attendance.
• The curriculum and wider enrichment experiences do not adequately support pupils' personal development. This means that pupils have gaps in their knowledge. The school and the trust should ensure that the curriculum includes age-appropriate opportunities to learn about relationships and sex education, protected characteristics and fundamental British values.
All pupils should receive this curriculum. ? The school has not provided careers information, education, advice and guidance to pupils. This means that pupils are not prepared for their future working life.
The school must provide pupils in Years 8 to 11 with meaningful experiences of the world of work. The trust must meet the requirements of the provider access legislation. ? The trust has not identified and tackled the failings at the school.
As a result, pupils are not receiving an adequate education. The trust should ensure that leadership capacity and expertise are quickly developed. ? Having considered the evidence, we strongly recommend that the school does not seek to appoint early career teachers.